What to do about Tyranny

Nobody loves a tyrant, but like moths to a flame, plenty are drawn to them. As with the moths, it rarely ends well.

For present purposes, let’s say tyranny is the unjust use of coercion, violence, fear, and/or manipulation to control people.

It’s probably uncontroversial to say tyranny is bad for people. It harms the psyche and the body, both individually and collectively. Which is a bummer, because it’s quite common. All political systems, ever, everywhere, have featured at least some tyranny. Many if not most are flat out built on it. Workplaces, religions, families, schoolyards–you often don’t have to look far to find it.

Our instinct is to fight tyranny (except when we are the tyrant, or on the tyrant’s team). But Christianity and Daoism seem to recommend a different path. Why?

–Attributed to George Fox, in answer to a question from William Penn about wearing his sword.

This story is like the story of Jesus telling a group of Pharisees “let he who is without sin cast the first stone.” Apocryphal, but too good a story to abandon. It suggests that conscience is a more formidable foe to tyranny than force is.

–Matthew 5: 38-40, NIV

–Laozi, 22, translated by Gia-fu Feng and Jane English

Laozi, 36

Laozi, 76

Zhuangzi (Chuang Tzu) tells a story in which a disciple of Confucius proposes to go advise a ruler who has gotten out of hand:

–Zhuanzi, transl. Burton Watson

Questions:

  1. Do Daoism and Christianity really advise us against fighting tyranny? 
  2. Or, are they suggesting that “yielding” and “turning the other cheek” are effective ways to fight tyranny? 
  3. Are they crazy? Or, do they just want us to be ineffective?
  4. Or what. What’s going on here?
  5. What do you think our response to tyranny ought to be?