Last night I saw an early showing of the new D’Souza documentary “2000 Mules”. It was yet another chapter in the chronicle of the theft of the 2020 presidential election. This one was a fascinating story of high-tech forensics applied to ballot harvesting in key swing states. It told the story of over two thousand ballot “mules” who delivered hundreds of thousands of ballots to thousands of dropboxes in states key to the election outcome. The total number of ballots delivered was sufficient to swing the outcome of the election in those states from the legitimate winner, Trump, to the illegitimate beneficiary, Biden. The documentary was the usual high-caliber production we have come to expect from Mr. D’Souza, but I was nonetheless left with several questions at the end. The movie showed an official dropbox monitoring video of numerous people showing up in the dead of night to place multiple envelopes in official dropboxes. While it did not prove that the envelopes contained ballots, it is more than likely that they were not delivering supermarket advertising circulars to dropboxes in the mistaken belief that they were post office mailboxes.
ET phoned home
Investigators used the geolocation capability now built into nearly every cell phone to identify and track mules as they traveled from dropbox to dropbox, delivering their messages of joy throughout the land. In addition to location, each phone provided identification information unique to a user. This sort of information has been used by law enforcement and federal agencies to track criminal activities worldwide. The investigators demonstrated one instance where they were able to use the same technology to solve a cold murder case where the new evidence led to the arrest of two perpetrators. Clearly, the evidence they collected of ballot harvesting is at least as good for felony ballot harvesting by tens of thousands of ballot mules – many more than the two thousand who were tracked in detail. One could imagine that various law enforcement agencies would be interested in having such a wealth of information handed to them gratis so they could prosecute such criminal activity. Or maybe not.
An organized crime
The movie also showed mules stopping at the offices of various Non-Government Organizations, where they could pick up more ballots to deliver. An interview with a former employee at one of those locations was told not to talk to investigators because she could “end up in pieces in various trash cans”. She is to be commended for her courage. Does that perhaps indicate why there has been so little interest in investigating the numerous instances of fraud that stole the outcome of the election? I was disappointed that the movie did not name the NGOs involved, but perhaps that information will be provided to those brave law officers who might wish to investigate and prosecute such fraud.
Fraud on an unprecedented scale
Election fraud has been with us for nearly as long as there have been elections. Prior to 2020, though, with only a very few exceptions, fraud was relatively minor in scope, typically with only a few votes affected. In 2020, the scale changed. Based on the evidence presented in the movie, over 300,000 bogus votes were injected into the counts in just five key states. Over 137,000 illegal votes were found in Wisconsin alone. Unfortunately, we cannot know which ballots are fraudulent, because once a mail-in ballot is separated from its envelope, it is mixed with legitimate ballots and is indistinguishable from all the rest.
