Our story about the four children who were discovered in a South Boston city housing apartment where a dead man was found Saturday has gone viral in right wing circles after being retweeted by Jack Posobiec, Matt Walsh, Mike Cernovich, Chris Elston, and many others who were aghast over the official report from the Boston Fire Department.
Initial reports from BFD Captain Jonathan Hernandez stated that there were drugs, sex toys, and four children being hidden in a back room of Apt 621, and that the men who were all dressed as women did not cooperate when first responders arrived. Mayor Wu, as well as the majority of the Boston City Council, has not said a word about it.
I have never seen a police department put out a statement accusing a fire department of lying in their initial report. Here are the key aspects of the BFD report that BPD refuted in that statement:
Yet BPD is now stating that there was nothing in the apartment that was unusual. Just a man who died from something that is commonly associated with cocaine usage.
In Detective Sean Flynn’s report it states that the unnamed victim’s unnamed mother was notified within 4 hours of him dying. The victim’s name is redacted and takes up almost an entire line of text. Their sex required four redactions, and their race and address were redacted as well. He also lists the apartment as 625, not 621.
We don’t know if this was the person who rents the apartment. We don’t know who lives there at all. And why is the apartment different now? Is it because they don’t want the public to find out who lives at 621, or did Captain Hernandez make a mistake?
More importantly, why are they hiding the name of the deceased? Police only do this when the next of kin hasn’t been notified, but the report clearly states that the mother was made aware. The only reason to do that is because the police don’t want the public to know who the deceased is.
Why is that?
Who is this person?
Who are they connected to?
Are they politically connected?
There is no plausible reason for the police to hide the name of a dead person unless that person is connected to someone or it would interfere with a political narrative.
Officer De Los Santos’ report lists the deceased as “known to the commonwealth,” and redacts their age as well.
his usually means that it’s a public official or someone with a long criminal rap sheet. Mayor Wu was listed as “known to the commonwealth” two weeks ago in a police report after her BPD driver illegally used their blue lights to go through a red light, striking a woman and her baby whom they subsequently blamed for the crash. The City still has not given an explanation why that officer had her blue lights on.
De Los Santos report was very careful not to say whether or not the dead “person” was male or female anywhere in their report. She also lists the address as 321 Old Colony Ave, not 381 Old Colony Ave
There are several instances in that report where De Los Santos could have written “her” or “him.” If this were a transgender male who identifies as a woman, why isn’t that mentioned? These are people who go out of their way to police pronoun usage, and who constantly want to be identified as the gender they choose. Suddenly they’re shy about talking about gender identity?
Two days later on June 19 police were once again called to unit 625 at 381 Colony Ave to assist DCF in the removal of two children from the same apartment where a dead body was discovered two days prior. At least 3 adults were present, all of whom had their name, sex, age, or race redacted in the report despite the offense code being listed as “investigate person”
In this same apartment unit in November of 2019 Officer De Los Santos responded to a call for a dead man who was “known to the commonwealth.” His pronouns and race WERE LISTED in the report.
Why aren’t the Boston Police saying the race or sex of the dead person they discovered on June 17? Is it because it would provide too many context clues? Is it because the person is a black transgender man who identifies as a woman, and that this would be bad publicity for the transgender community during Pride month and Juneteenth? The Daily Mail is reporting that it was a black trans woman (a black man who identifies as female) who was found dead.
Let’s be clear – the Boston Police Department is calling this Cristiano Ronaldo doppelganger an outright liar. He seems a lot more credible than the Boston Police Department, all things considered.
Obey