According to Rep. Jason Smith (R-MO), the Department of Justice twice stopped David Weiss, the US Attorney handling the matter, from filing charges against Hunter, once in California and once in Washington, DC. That directly contradicts statements made by Attorney General Merrick Garland to the press that Weiss would be given full control, without interference from DOJ leadership, on how to proceed in investigating and prosecuting the president’s troubled son. As you’ll see in a moment, things get worse from there.
Yet, if Weiss was capable of “making any decisions” he felt appropriate, why did DOJ leadership step in to stop him from filing charges in other venues? There’s no way to square that circle, and the next question is obviously what those charges were. Was Weiss attempting to charge the more serious offenses mentioned by the IRS whistleblower as having been heavily evidenced by mid-2022?
That’s the next part of this revealed by the whistleblower. They say that the DOJ had enough evidence to charge Hunter Biden with felonies for tax evasion, making false statements, and willful failure to file taxes. Why was the president’s son instead let off with a couple of misdemeanor fines and pre-trial diversion for his gun crime? It’s also not much of a stretch to say that the DOJ had Hunter Biden dead to rights on FARA violations given emails showing that he was being paid by foreign entities to lobby the US government (namely, his father). That’s the very definition of a FARA violation.
R&I-Rawr
DGM