Hack Democrat attorney Abbe Lowell has been making the rounds on the liberal cable news shows, spinning for his client Hunter Biden after Friday’s appointment of a special counsel. He blamed the failed plea agreement on “every MAGA right wing fanatic” (you’re welcome, Abbe) on CNN, and then had a completely insane appearance on CBS’ Face the Nation on Sunday in which things he argued during one section of the interview were contradicted by things he said in another.
How can there be such a fundamental misunderstanding, Lowell was asked?
It did come down to fundamentally that, and then a couple of issues as to what a judge’s role could be in the proceedings that the prosecutors wrote the documents for. And how could it happen? I gave you the three possibilities. They wrote the language, they insisted on that language, they insisted on two different documents.
And that language would be broad immunity? Yes, despite what many pundits said in the days after the plea agreement failure, Biden’s attorneys did believe it was extremely broad immunity.
Lowell, ever the hack, says that there is no way that FARA charges could still be contemplated, because there was a complete and thorough investigation. He then suggests that if the Special Counsel decides something different it’s because of politics.
As predicted, Lowell claims that the Diversion Agreement, with that broad immunity deal, has the signatures for it to be binding
However, the diversion agreement as filed does not have the Probation Office signature. I’m not sure if that has to be done in order for the agreement to be in effect, but we’ll likely be finding that out in the coming days. Lowell continues, claiming that all the diversion agreement needed to be was a bilateral agreement between the parties in order for it to be binding.
In the DOJ’s filing on August 11, in which they sought to vacate the court’s briefing order, they said that both the diversion agreement and the plea agreement were dead.
Approved ~ FS
DGM