The Times did get an interview with President Trump’s top advisor on immigration, Stephen Miller, but only printed a few phrases here and there as to what he said, which kind of tells us they didn’t want us to know about it. They’ll keep that information to themselves.
But in their own words they noted, way down in the piece, that there wouldn’t be any shifts in existing law under this plan by President Trump, merely an interest in upholding existing law.
Like we are supposed to be upset about this.
Not allowing illegal immigration? What an outrageous idea in the minds of these Times writers.
Legal immigration is the law. Illegal immigration is not. Don’t like the law, get Congress to change it. But the Times, for all its howlings about threats to ‘democracy’ doesn’t want the law, which is kind of odd thing to be against in a democracy with rule of law.
The old ‘threat to democracy’ crap as if seven million people crossing into the U.S. with no vetting whatsoever and all of them presumed to have valid asylum cases enough to wait for years here and get a free work pass and obtain a free benefit package in the U.S. was some kind of ‘legal’ authorized by Congress, which has the sole Constitutional authority to set immigration numbers.
There’s nothing legal about this at all. If the U.S. doesn’t have resources to process migrant asylum claims in a timely manner, then the U.S. can’t be taking applications for this process at al. And it shouldn’t. Asylum abuse has clogged courts with cases sporting a 90% rejection rate as most applicants are just economic migrants looking to jump the immigration queue and claim benefits.
Approved – Sully
DGM
Article URL : https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/11/new_york_times_in_a_panic_over_trumps_promise_to_uphold_us_immigration_law.html