Why it matters: The 2024 presidential candidate would not be protected by presidential immunity regarding remarks made before the attack because his re-election campaign was “not an official presidential act,” a three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia held.
- “The Office of the Presidency as an institution is agnostic about who will occupy it next,” Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan wrote. “And campaigning to gain that office is not an official act of the office.”
Context: Presidential immunity doesn’t extend to unofficial actions, the court said, turning to precedent set in former immunity lawsuits, including one against former President Bill Clinton by then-Arkansas state employee Paula Jones over sexual advances.
- “When he acts in an unofficial, private capacity, he is subject to civil suits like any private citizen,” Srinivasan wrote.