Ever been to a club where the bouncer checking IDs at the door is also working a clicker to keep a headcount so the place doesn’t violate the fire code capacity (by too much). Each person in is a click, each person out is a click. It makes sense and avoids any serious issues. Democrats are like that bouncer, only their clicker has an endless supply of buttons with each one representing some random configuration of human beings – skin color, gender, sexual orientation, pronouns, whatever weird mental health issue they’re pretending is not something for which people are desperate for help, but instead perfectly normal as it further rips that person apart. You know, the stuff progressives do – divide to conquer.
The true “look” of America is people the most qualified getting the job, the best winning, and people be able to go wherever they want without regard to their skin color holding them back. We fought a war against Democrats to end slavery, then spent 100 years fighting the segregation and Jim Crow laws they put in place to keep people hating each other.
The most common button on the “progressive clicker,” and their favorite, is the race button. They wear it to a nub on an average day on MSNBC with the fervor of Hunter Biden face-planting into a pile of blow. It’s their go-to for everything. What used to be an emergency brake for when they were losing an argument is now their opening salvo – calling something racist is easier than trying to make a case or refuting facts and reality.
That’s wearing pretty thin, as most people yawn at the charge now. The 1619 Project and the NAACP both declared pointing out the plagiarism of Claudine Gay, President of Harvard and, aside from Joe Biden, America’s most successful academic fraud, to be racist. When I heard it I laughed. Gay is obviously a diversity hire – her resume is as thin as the paper it was printed on, and shaved even thinner now that about half of her “academic” writing has been exposed for being littered with the stolen work of others.
Gay’s schtick, however, is all race-based. Her “research” centered around how black people, particularly women, have it tough because of “systemic racism.” She is so oppressed, as a matter of fact, that she was able to ascend to the head of Harvard, even though it has been known by Harvard for some time that she violated the academic standards Harvard holds their students to. Were I one of the students booted from Harvard for not being President Gay, I mean violating their honor code, I’d sue. Why not?
But Gay plays the race game by allowing other leftists to play it in her name. And Democrats will always rally around anyone who does that, no matter how big of an embarrassment that person is to normal, non-race-obsessed people. She lets them click that button at the door.
So does Boston Mayor Michelle Wu.
Wu, who is a member of the racial group Democrats hate almost as much as evil whitey, doesn’t let that fact stand in the way of her using race every chance she gets. It’s important to remember that progressives are progressive first, anything else a distant second. So, if a political objective conflicts with something they’ve preached previously, the immediate always wins.
That’s how Wu, the Bull Connor of Boston (hey, Democrats honor Democrats), could host an “electeds of color” holiday party on the city’s dime. A “Colored entrance” sign is rightly disgusting, but an “Electeds of color entrance” sign is a template for a tramp stamp tattoo for every university’s valedictorian in the school of gender and race studies and a point of pride for Democrats.
Democrats discriminate against Asians constantly – everything from refusing them entry into institutions like Harvard to simply beating the hell out of them randomly on the street – but it’s agenda über alles for the left. With no sense of irony or shame, Wu defended her bigotry because what does she care? “The system” she and her fellow travelers whine about being oppressive has been very, very good to her.
Everything about these leftists is hypocritical. In a bit of hilarity, both Wu and Gay, who rail constantly about how oppressive white people are, are both married to white men. Are claims of oppression confessions about their bedrooms? Or are they simply lying because that’s what Democrats have to do in order to maintain status and power?
Obey
Article URL : https://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2023/12/17/democrats-love-racists-because-they-are-racists-n2632511