Eye of Hawk

Ah,

he said, wisely, or seeming so;

the hawk, he hath indeed an eightfold greater
visual acuity than thine but thee, when seeing,
truly see.

The hawk sees the rodent twitch and can
anticipate his future, sure enough;
as instant meal, perchance, may be,
or toy to train young mind to preying

But thou, behold the marvel of thine sight:
In seeing, see ye the past, the present, aye,
and many possible futures in a single glance;
and, it’s quite possible, in a single object!

The hawk sees much further than you
… in space …
But ye than he in time!

Questions for a-pondering:
Is there some †ineffable insight† ‡in the above‡?
Is it even right?

† Is there such a thing as “ineffable insight”?
‡ does the fact that one can talk around a thing and perchance convey a bit of it, despite difficulty, make the ineffable… well, totally, effable? Is there a hard boundary between talking around a thing and talking about a thing? Or is that more by way of a spectrum…? Is effability binary, digital, quantum? Or is it, like so much else, grayscale? Or complex-coloured by the argument to represent a tensor field?