Next in an occasional series on Daoism.
Daoism values equanimity. Here’s how Zhuangzi (also Chuang Tzu, pronounced Jwong dzuh) describes the “True man”:
The True Man of ancient times knew nothing of loving life, knew nothing of hating death. He emerged without delight; he went back in without a fuss. He came briskly, he went briskly, and that was all. He didn’t forget where he began; he didn’t try to find out where he would end. He received something and took pleasure in it; he forgot about it and handed it back again. This is what I call not using the mind to repel the Way, not using man to help out Heaven. This is what I call the True Man.
. . .he was dignified in his correctness but not insistent; he was vast in his emptiness but not ostentatious. Mild and cheerful, he seemed to be happy; reluctant, he could not help doing certain things; annoyed, he let it show in his face; relaxed, he rested in his virtue.
Questions:
Whaddya think? How does the “True Man” compare with the Christian ideal? Jewish? Muslim? Hindu? Buddhist?
Is equanimity a good thing? Bad? Good to a point? If the latter, does that smack of moral relativism? If so, is that a problem?
How does one achieve equanimity? Are there shortcuts?