You may believe that the Book of Mormon is divinely inspired scripture
You may believe that the Qur’an is divinely inspired scripture
You may believe that the Christian Bible (or one version thereof – for there’s no one “the” Christian Bible) is divinely inspired scripture
You may believe that the Tanakh is divinely inspired scripture
You may believe that the Talmud is divinely inspired commentary
You may believe that the Kitáb-i-Aqdas is the most holy of books
There are other family-branches of religions, too, of course, so
You may believe that the Vedas were divinely inspired, or the Bhagavad Gita
You may harbour that which may be labelled or mislabelled, if you like, as a pseudo-theistic reverence for Tipiṭaka
Perhaps you consider the Agamas divine, along with the teachings of the 24 Tirthankaras
Or to get closer back to the base of the family tree of Abrahamic faiths on the tree of religions (like the tree of life, since they too evolved), perhaps you think that the Avesta of Zoroastrianism is whispered first in a heavenly realm before being echoed in text back here on Planet Earth.
What I’d like to know if you fall into any of these categories (or any more I’ve missed) is this: do you have a single cogent reason to attribute the sequencing of human words to some supernatural realm?
And for a bonus question or two to think about: who chose what was and what wasn’t canonical? If there are no cogent reasons by which to conclude that any deity had anything to do with any particular human words (and I know of none, correct my ways if you know of any) then by what possible reliable method could any person hope to use to determine what exact versions of what exact documents should (and which should not) be considered divinely sanctioned if not outright divinely authored?