The Angry Homicidal God in the OT v’s the Cursed son of God Hung on a Tree in the NT!
The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) is now thought to of been first written about 600 BCE, according to the researchers from the Tel Aviv University (TAU), working on pieces of *ostraca. Rather than the previous scholarly belief of a Hebrew Bible exemplar used for the Greek Old Testament aka Septuagint aka LXX, dated between 3rd, and 2nd-century BCE.
If the question was asked, what is the oldest extant Hebrew Bible? Well, the Dead Sea Scrolls are fragments of the oldest Hebrew Bible text, but there are dozens of scrolls have varying Carbon 14C, with a 2-sigma error rating, which means at 95% confidence of the dating. The earliest dates from the 3rd-century BCE to the more recent 2nd-century CE. While the Aleppo Codex and the Leningrad Codex are the oldest complete versions, written by the Masoretes in the 10th and 11th centuries CE, respectively. Today’s Judaism used the Masoretic Text compiled by the Masoretes between the 5th, and 10th-century, which has known textual errors. No different from the New Testament, and its man-made anomalies.
The Old Testament (OT)
The OT is mainly about the genocide of the Hebrew God’s invention, namely Mankind. Which we are to assume God could not get his invention right, as there are six genocides of humankind in the OT. Nobody seems to be safe from the wrath of God, men, women, and children slaughtered by God’s henchmen. Moses being one of the prime participants of God’s heinous commands. Furthermore, on God’s list of disposing of his creation is abortions (see Number 5) attained in a misogynist world. As well as keeping, young girls who had not slept with men were spared the massacre of their parents, and other siblings. These young girls were given as a gift to paedophile soldiers from their God for the good work in the genocide slaughter of mankind.
The New Testament (NT)
The NT came about when the Patriarch, and 20th Coptic Pope of Alexandria, Egypt, Athanasius, defined the NT during his Easter letter in 367 CE. Athanasius (296/8–373 CE) was also known as Athanasius Contra Mundum (Latin for ‘Athanasius Against the World’). He did not get on with the Roman emperors of his time, including Constantine I (301-337), whom he met as a deacon at the Council of Nicaea in 325 CE. The early Coptic’s had a bad reputation for being intolerant of other faiths, as we see in the destruction of the Serapeum, its Art, and library in 391 CE. Ask any conservative Christian about what the NT is about, and you inevitably get “its infallibility” “the word of God,” or “the sayings of Jesus.” Well, they would be Incorrect, it is a biograph, but not of Jesus, although mentioned, it is all hearsay. However, it is Paul, who commands close to 50% of the 27 books of the NT, plus Paul gave us Pauline Christianity, today’s religion. So what is the NT made up of, well, fakery, forgery, and hearsay. The Jesus parts cover: birth, puberty, ministry, and death, which he was cursed by God, also see Deuteronomy 21:22-23. For those who disagree, they should research the NT verses Acts 5:30 KJV, Acts 10:39 KJV, Acts 13:29 KJV, 1 Peter 2:24 KJV, Galatians 3:13, KJV, all agree with the Temple Scroll, even Paul says that Jesus was cursed and hung on a tree.
“If a man commits a crime punishable by death, and he defects into the midst of the nations and curses his people, the children of Israel, you shall hang him also on the tree so that he dies. And their bodies shall not remain upon the tree, but you shall bury them the same day, for those who hang on the tree are accursed by God and men, you must not defile the land which I give you as an inheritance.”—(Temple Scroll 64:6–13)
Although the synoptic gospels are said to have been written between four or five decades after Jesus’ supposed death, there are no dates (?) on any of the forementioned occurrences. One would expect the hype that the NT gives to the death of Jesus, that it would have been mentioned in Roman documents, or even the writings outside the Bible in the first-century. But there is nothing, only what contradictory evidence within the NT. There is no argument that there are thousands of manuscripts (MMS) on Jesus, he is the most written person in history, but, the vast amount of these manuscripts are forgeries, and duplicated over, and over. The 5,000 + Greek mms, alone, have no two manuscripts the same, even though they are writing about the same thing. Most of the forgeries within the NT can be attributed to the Roman Catholic Church, for their tenure, from 381CE to 1521CE, covers some 1,140 years.
I have in past discussions mentioned the eighteen-year lapse in Jesus’ whereabouts, as He is absent in the NT from the age of 12–30. And I have conjectured after reading the works of Celsus, that these missing years were spent by Jesus as a servant/slave in Egypt, owing to his poverty, and learning the art of magic. Well, the Jewish Encyclopedia says this:
The sojourn of Jesus in Egypt is an essential part of the story of his youth. According to the Gospels, he was in that country in his early infancy, but Celsus says that he was in service there and learned magic; hence he was there in early manhood. This assumption may serve to throw more light on the obscure history of Jesus than the account found in the Gospels. —The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VII.
There is a passage in the above source which implies that Jesus lived a hundred years earlier than what the NT states. The line reads: … The references to Yannai, Salome Alexandra, and Joshua b. Perahyah indicate that according to the Jewish legends, the advent of Jesus took place just one century before the actual historical date… [Ibid]
What do you say?
G.P. (Mrs) P.P. Jero Jones
R&I ~ MJM
Jero Jones
Article URL : https://breakingnewsandreligion.online/discuss/